Abbey
1 min readAug 3, 2020

--

I think this is so interesting. Really out of the box thinking.

I actually brought the idea up with my boyfriend who’s a biochemist by PhD. His main concern was that doing metabolite testing on meat products would make the food extremely expensive. I guess these biochemical methods don’t run cheap.

I also wonder if we found “good” markers in animals living under high quality conditions, how easy would it be to fake these markers? For example, if animals outdoors in the sun had healthier markers would it be possible for some processors to get the same markers by investing in bright lighting inside their facility? Or find some other way to fake the “good” status.

That being said, there’s already problems with fraud in the food industry, so it wouldn’t be anything new. If people really want to cheat the system, they can usually find a way.

Thank you so much for the intriguing comment. I love thinking about stuff like this.

Sign up to discover human stories that deepen your understanding of the world.

Free

Distraction-free reading. No ads.

Organize your knowledge with lists and highlights.

Tell your story. Find your audience.

Membership

Read member-only stories

Support writers you read most

Earn money for your writing

Listen to audio narrations

Read offline with the Medium app

--

--

Abbey
Abbey

Written by Abbey

I’m a food scientist by PhD, a science writer, and a YouTuber. I’m fascinated by food science and enjoy writing and sharing what I’ve learn.

No responses yet

Write a response